
Every decision. Backed by the source.
Compare bids, review submittals, and find project documents, with every result tied to the source.
The documents exist. The decision is still hard.
Scopes, proposals, specifications, product data, drawings, and RFIs arrive in different formats and different language. Teams still have to rebuild the evidence trail before they can compare, review, or act.
- 01
Same scope. Different proposal language.
Exclusions, qualifications, alternates, and silence hide across bidder files, so risk is easy to miss before award.
- 02
The requirement and the submission live apart.
Specifications, RFIs, product data, and review notes have to be reconciled before a project team can decide what is supported, missing, or unclear.
- 03
The field asks by intent. Files are stored by name.
The current drawing, approved submittal, or RFI response may exist, but reaching the right source still becomes an office handoff.
Three workflows. One path back to the source.
Compare subcontractor bids, review a submittal against governing requirements, or retrieve a project document. In each workflow, the result stays connected to evidence a person can inspect.
- 01Project sourcesScopes, proposals, specifications, submittals, files, and sheets
- 02Compare, review, or retrieveChoose the workflow for the decision
- 03Verify evidenceInspect the quote, requirement, submission, file, or cited page
- 04Deliver the actionReview the matrix, preserve the record, or open the source
Level proposals against one scope.
Select a matrix finding to see the requirement, proposal language, cited page, confidence, and review state behind it.
Pacific Power, Light fixtures: Alternate. +$214k alternate. Proposal evidence on page 2.
Bring one fictional trade package, one sanitized submittal packet, or one approved drawing set. We will show the full source path in the demo.
Request demo